Multicomponent soil supplement

ABSTRACT

Homogeneous solid fusions of particulate mineral nutrients in a continuous rhombic sulfur matrix containing at least about 50 weight percent sulfur are disclosed. These materials are obtained by dispersing throughout a sulfur melt at a temperature of 120° to about 400° C. a nutrient-hydrocarbon comixture containing sufficient hydrocarbon to thoroughly wet all surfaces of the mineral nutrient, preferably sufficient to form a suspension of the nutrient in the hydrocarbon, followed by cooling to form the solid fusion. These materials have particular utility in agronomic applications as soil supplements for supplying both sulfur (as sulfate) and mineral nutrients at a continuous, regulated rate from inexpensive raw materials.

This application is a divisional of my copending application Ser. No.805,130, filed June 9, 1977 and now U.S. Pat. No. 4,133,668.

Background

Due to the increasing demands on the agricultural industry, there is acommensurate need for supplementing plant nutrients, either by soil orfoliar application. These nutrients include a variety of minerals suchas phosphorus, zinc, iron, copper, magnesium, manganese, molybdenum andboron. Elemental sulfur supplies soluble sulfate. It has the furtheradvantage of reducing soil alkalinity.

It is often desirable to supplement soil concentrations of more than oneof these nutrients in a single application. Thus it would be beneficialto have a single nutrient combination in an easily handleable form thatwould not segregate during transport or application.

Obviously, all of the nutrients could be supplied individually; and thatprocedure has the equally obvious advantage of allowing immediateon-site variation of nutrient concentration. However, it has thedisadvantage that all nutrients are not maintained in immediateproximity to each other. In some cases this factor is not particularlysignificant. However, I have found that bacterial sulfur oxidationcreates an acidic environment in the vicinity of the sulfur particlesand that this environment can convert insoluble mineral nutrients suchas mineral oxides, carbonates and sulfides, to soluble sulfates. Thisacidification even improves the mobility of nutrients applied as solublecompounds in calcareous soils by reducing the tendency of otherwisemobile compounds to convert immobile hydroxides, oxides, or the like.These nutrients must be made available to the plant roots in a soluble,mobile form to allow their assimilation by the crop.

The acidizing effect of elemental sulfur applied in any reasonabledosages, e.g., 20 to 800 pounds per acre, exists only, or at least to alarge extent, in the area adjacent the sulfur particle. Thus, at leastin calcareous soils, soil pH will increase with distance from theparticle surface. Due to this effect and the beneficial influence ofsulfur acidification on nutrient mobility, particularly on theconversion of insoluble, immobile compounds to mobile forms, it would bedesirable to assure that all of the applied nutrient is fixed in theimmediate vicinity of, and preferably within, the sulfur particle. It iseven more desirable that the nutrient compound be evenly distributedthroughout the matrix of the sulfur particle to assure gradual nutrientrelease rather than a slugging effect that would result from alternativeprocedures such as surface coating.

There are a number of mineral nutrient sources. Some are soluble such asthe sulfates, nitrates and complexes with chelating agents, all of whichare known in the agricultural industry. Inexpensive nutrients can beobtained as the oxides, sulfides and carbonate, the oxides beingparticularly preferred due to availability and low cost. However, in anattempt to form homogeneous combinations of these supplements withmolten sulfur I discovered that they could not be distributed throughoutthe sulfur melt even with reasonably severe agitation. While betterdistribution, if not homogeneous combinations, might be obtained withextremely high shear mixing techniques in some cases, such techniquesincrease capital cost and operating expense.

Therefore, it is one object of this invention to provide a method forproducing homogeneous, solid fusions of inexpensive, finely dividedmineral nutrients in a continuous rhombic sulfur matrix. Another objectis the provision of an improved continuous process for the formation ofsuch homogeneous solid fusions. Yet another object is the provision ofimproved, homogeneous solid fusions of inexpensive mineral nutrientsdispersed throughout a continuous rhombic sulfur matrix which assure aneven, gradual nutrient release from the sulfur particles as a result ofgradual, bacterial oxidation. Another object is the provision of methodsfor producing such mineral-sulfur solid fusions that result in little orno nutrient loss during manufacture, e.g., by leaching by aqueous quenchmedia.

In accordance with one embodiment, homogeneous solid fusions ofparticulate mineral nutrients dispersed in a continuous rhombic sulfurmatrix are obtained by dispersing throughout a sulfur melt anutrient-hydrocarbon comixture containing at least about 10 weightpercent of a finely divided water-insoluble plant nutrient compound andat least about 2 weight percent of a non-polar hydrocarbon. Thehydrocarbon concentration must be at least sufficient to completely wetthe exterior surfaces of the finely divided nutrient. Mild agitation issufficient to assure even distribution of the nutrient-hydrocarboncomixture throughout the melt. The resulting suspension is then cooledto a temperature below the melting point to form blocks or particles ofthe homogeneous, nutrient-sulfur fusion as desired.

The nutrient compounds are selected for their relatively low cost,availability and water insolubility. Water insolubility is particularlydesirable in the preferred embodiment which involves comminuting andsolidifying the sulfur-nutrient melt by contacting with water. Suchnutrients include calcium phosphate and the oxides, sulfides andcarbonates of zinc, iron, copper, magnesium, manganese, molybdenum andboron. Of the nutrients other than phosphorus, the oxides areparticularly preferred due to their very low solubility, availabilityand low cost.

To one degree or another, all of these materials suffer from thedisadvantage that they can be dispersed in molten sulfur only withconsiderable difficulty, if at all. Thus the formation of a completelyhomogeneous distribution of the nutrient compound in the sulfur meltprior to quenching is difficult if not impossible. I have found thatthis difficulty can be overcome by assuring that all surfaces of thenutrient compound are coated with a non-polar hydrocarbon prior toadmixture with the sulfur melt.

The same is true of the insoluble calcium phosphate source. By thesemethods the phosphate can be easily and uniformly dispersed in moltensulfur in relatively high concentrations, e.g., up to about 50 weightpercent. The combinations also have other notable advantages inagricultural use.

Calcium phosphates are widely available as several minerals such asapatite, usually containing fluorine, e.g., fluoro-apatite, somecopyrolites and some phosphorites of which significant deposits exist inboth this and foreign countries.

Available, i.e., soluble phosphate, is usually derived from insolublecalcium phosphate by dissolving the calcium phosphate in sulfuric acidto release phosphoric acid and calcium sulfate (gypsum) both of whichhave agronomic value. The product acid, generally known as wet-processphosphoric acid, is a widely used industrial and agricultural commodity.The usual manufacturing methods require the preliminary manufacture ofsulfuric acid and, in the great majority, if not all cases, requireseparation of the dilute phosphoric acid from insoluble calcium sulfatebyproduct.

The most widely used sulfuric acid manufacturing procedure involvessulfur oxidation to sulfur dioxide which is then converted to sulfurtrioxide over a vanadium catalyst followed by hydrolysis to the acid.Once obtained, this acid is used to convert insoluble calcium phosphate(from fluoroapatite or otherwise) to insoluble calcium sulfate anddilute phosphoric acid. The phosphoric acid is then recovered in thesupernatent phase and concentrated by conventional procedures. Calciumsulfate is recovered by filtration. Both of these materials can be usedas soil additives.

I have found that the embodiment of this invention employing crudephosphate rock eliminates all of the manufacturing steps involved in theconventional production of calcium sulfate and phosphoric acid referredto above. It does so in a very effective manner in that the resultingsulfur fusions, being homogeneous, assure continuous availability ofsoluble phosphate and sulfur as calcium sulfate at a rate dependent onlyon the rate of sulfur-active bacterial action.

In this respect another advantage of this invention is that the activityof heterotropic thiobacillae is increased due to the presence ofhydrocarbon in the sulfur matrix. The hydrocarbon provides a carbonsource for the bacteria thereby accelerating their growth andconsequently the conversion of sulfur to sulfuric acid. By thistechnique the amount and type of hydrocarbon can be controlled orselected to control the rate of phosphate and sulfur release. All ofthese things are accomplished with very inexpensive, readily availableminerals, e.g., elemental sulfur and crude phosphate rock.

Accordingly, the methods and compositions of this invention have severalsignificant advantages over those known to the prior art. They allow forthe use of inexpensive readily available water-insoluble oxides,sulfides and carbonates. They require much less agitation or shear toobtain adequate nutrient distribution than is the case with alternativemethods. They result in easily obtained, homogeneous, macronutrientdispersions in both the sulfur melt and product matrix. They minimize orcompletely eliminate nutrient loss during formulation or shipment, andthey do not so weaken the product particles as to make them friable intransport or use.

On the contrary, I have found that the hydrocarbon results in severaladvantages other than nutrient dispersibility. The product particles,when formed as such, are more fluid than are particles not containinghydrocarbon. They have significantly less tendency to dust or autoigniteduring transport or use and they do not bridge and plug transportationand application equipment. Product homogeneity assures more uniformnutrient release. The hydrocarbon also accelerates heterotrophicbacteria activity and therefore increases nutrient release rate. Due tothe low shear mixing made possible by these methods, they are readilyadaptable to continuous, low shear formulation procedures.

The preferred metal nutrients are zinc, iron, copper, magnesium,manganese, molybdenum and boron in the form of the corresponding oxides,carbonates and sulfides. The oxides are particularly preferred for thereason discussed above. I have also found that these materials,particularly the oxides, can be compounded into very concentratedhydrocarbon comixtures to produce fluid suspensions containing up to 75weight percent of the metal oxide. I have also discovered that such highconcentrations, e.g., above 30 weight percent of the metal oxide,particularly the oxides of zinc and iron, can be obtained only underanhydrous conditions. Accordingly, oxides containing water should beheated to a temperature sufficient to drive off water, e.g., at leastabout 110°, preferably at least about 120° C., for a period sufficientto produce an anhydrous powder. Care should also be taken to assure thatthe oil is substantially anhydrous so that the total composition, i.e.,metal oxide and oil, contains less than 0.5 weight percent water. Underthese conditions, relatively stable nutrient-hydrocarbon suspensions canbe obtained with only minor agitation and can be maintained in that formwith only periodic agitation.

This characteristic greatly facilitates nutrient-sulfur mixing in eitherbatch or continuous operations. It allows for metering of thehydrocarbon-nutrient suspension directly into the melt at a controlledrate or in otherwise controlled amounts to provide a composition havingthe desired nutrient content. Furthermore, the availability of highnutrient content suspensions also minimizes the amount of hydrocarbonrequired to transport the desired amount of nutrient in a fluid form,when reduced hydrocarbon concentrations are desired. Similar suspensionscan be obtained with the calcium phosphate sources referred to above.

The several components should be mixed in proportions sufficient toassure a product fusion containing at least about 50, preferably atleast about 70, weight percent rhombic sulfur. The remainder of theproduct can comprise hydrocarbon and nutrient compound and/or othersolid components such as fillers, clays and the like, as desired. Thesecompositions can contain 1 to about 50, preferably 1 to about 20, weightpercent of the hydrocarbon-nutrient comixture.

The hydrocarbon-nutrient suspension can contain as little as one percentnutrient but usually contains at least about 5, often at least about 10,and preferably about 10 to about 75 weight percent nutrient compound.

Better nutrient-hydrocarbon distributions, more stable comixturesuspensions, and better product homogeneity are obtained when thenutrient compounds are added as finely divided particles. These areusually characterized as particles passing 50 mesh and preferablypassing 100 U.S. Standard screen.

The hydrocarbon-nutrient combination can be added either as anutrient-hydrocarbon suspension or as the finely divided solidscontaining sufficient hydrocarbon to completely coat all particlesurfaces. Thus, the comixture should contain at least about 2 weightpercent, preferably 30 to 95 weight percent hydrocarbon. The fluidsuspensions containing at least about 30 weight percent hydrocarbon arepresently preferred, particularly in continuous processes.

Due to the characteristics of these hydrocarbon-nutrient compoundcomixtures, they can be evenly distributed throughout the sulfur melt toform a homogeneous distribution under very low shear conditions, atleast as compared to the shear rates required to obtain homogeneity byother procedures. For instance, homogeneous compositions can be obtainedat the shear rate existing in turbulent pipeline flow within areasonable period of time, i.e., within 10 seconds or less. Thus,adequate mixing can be obtained at shear rates corresponding to a linearflow velocity only 10 percent above the maximum laminar flow velocity ina pipeline. The optimum amount of shear and time required for anyoperation can be easily determined by testing the design composition atseveral shear rates and times, and selecting the best combination byinterpolation.

The nutrient-hydrocarbon comixture can be added to the sulfur melt at atemperature of 120° to about 400° C., preferably 120° to about 250° C.by any one of several well-known procedures. However, in both batch andcontinuous operations it is presently preferred to meter a fluidsuspension of the comixture into the sulfur melt. This procedurefacilitates more accurate composition control and leads to homogeneousproducts with only minor agitation of the sulfur-comix combination. Itis particularly adaptable to continuous operations in which thecomixture and sulfur melt are continuously blended such as in an in-linemixer. Thus the sulfur melt can be continuously transferred from asulfur melt reservoir or other container and passed by pumps or underpressure into admixture with the nutrient-hydrocarbon comixture whichitself is continuously metered from a comix container. The container ispreferably provided with agitation means for maintaining an evensuspension of the nutrient compound and hydrocarbon prior to combinationwith the sulfur melt. These two streams are continuously mixed by anyone of numerous known in-line mixers, surge tanks, or the like. Thecombination is then cooled or quenched to form the homogeneous fusion.

The hydrocarbons are preferably liquid at ambient conditions or, moreappropriately, the temperature at which the nutrientcompound-hydrocarbon comixture is formed. If this temperature iselevated it is essential only that the hydrocarbon be fluid at thattemperature to allow adequate coating and mixing of the two components.The hydrocarbons should have a boiling point below the temperature atwhich the comixture is introduced to the sulfur melt to avoid flashingand hydrocarbon vapor evolution in the mixing apparatus.

Suitable hydrocarbons include virgin or partially refined crudes orsynthetic crudes, e.g., derived from coal, oil shale or other origins ofnatural or synthetic paraffins, aromatics and/or alkyl aromatics.Illustrative are paraffin waxes, gas oils, crude oils, reduced crude oilresiduum, naphtha, diesel oil, fuel oil, light and heavy gas oils,kerosene, jet fuel, 80 to 300 neutral oils, paraffin waxes, hydrocarbonhomoor hetero-polymer oils, waxes or thermoplastics such as polyolefins,polystyrene and the like.

The hydrocarbons should be non-polar and non-reactive with sulfur orother components of the composition at melt temperatures. They arepreferably paraffinic, aromatic or alkyl aromatic, or combinations ofthese. From the standpoint of reactivity and toxicity to both plants andsulfur-active bacteria, the hydrocarbons preferably contain, at most,only minor amounts of olefins, alkynes, alkenyl aromatics or compoundscontaining reactive or toxic functional groups such as hydroxyl, amino,ether, aldo, keto or carboxyl groups, or the like. However, thisexclusion does not apply to most halogenated hydrocarbons which aregenerally unreactive, at least at the lower melt temperatures within theabove ranges. Aromatics are somewhat more refractive to sulfur-activebacteria than are paraffinic hydrocarbons. Accordingly, paraffins orcompositions consisting primarily of paraffins are particularlypreferred for agronomic use.

These methods do not require surfactants to obtain homogeneousdistribution of the comixture in the sulfur melt. In fact, suchsurfactants are preferably avoided at least in most applications due totheir reactivity at melt temperatures and/or their toxicity orrefractiveness to sulfur-active bacteria.

Moreover, surfactants would be largely wasted in the preferredparticle-forming techniques which involve quenching and subdividing thesulfur-comix blend by contacting with liquid water under high shearconditions. At least some of the surfactant would be abstracted from thesulfur phase under these conditions and surfactant removal unavoidablyresults in hydrocarbon leaching from the sulfur matrix.

The melt can be cooled and solidified, and, if desired, can becomminuted by any one of several procedures. I have found that thesemelt blends have certain advantages over other formulations in waterquenching systems. Very little, if any, hydrocarbon or nutrient is lostto the water phase. Thus the melt can be cooled into blocks and crushedto the desired particle size or it can be air cooled by conventionalmethods, e.g., by prilling.

Particularly preferred methods involve water quenching by any one ofseveral techniques. The melt can be sprayed into a standing or agitatedaqueous quench in which case particle size can be regulated by spraysize and agitation severity. Other methods involve pouring a melt intoan agitated aqueous quench, in which case particle size is determinedprimarily by agitation severity.

A particularly preferred method is disclosed in my U.S. Pat. Nos.3,637,351, 3,769,378 and 3,830,631, incorporated herein by reference.Briefly, these methods involve contacting a high velocity water spraywith a high velocity spray of the homogeneous sulfur-hydrocarbon melt toform a highly turbulent intersection zone of the two sprays in which themelt is simultaneously subdivided and quenched into the porous particlessimilar to those described in the noted patents.

Whichever method is used, it is often desirable to obtain particleshaving diameters of about one inch or less, usually about one-half inchor less. The methods of my abovementioned U.S. Patents can produceparticles having diameters of about 0.02 to about 0.11 inch, and bulkdensities below about 1.9, generally below about 1.3, preferably about0.9 to about 1.3 grams per cc. They are further characterized byporosities of at least about 0.04, generally about 0.04 to about 0.15cc's per gram, and internal surface areas of at least about 20,preferably between about 30 and about 100 square meters per gram.

EXAMPLE 1

In this operation, zinc oxide powder was combined with molten sulfur inthe absence of oil. This combination was then comminuted and quenched asdescribed in my U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,637,351, 3,769,378 and 3,830,631. Thepowdered zinc oxide (minus 100 U.S. Standard Sieve) was gradually addedto agitated molten sulfur at a temperature of about 120° C. andagitation was continued to disperse the additive. Zinc concentration wasabout 3 weight percent as the oxide.

This suspension was passed to and ejected from the sulfur barrel of theapparatus while water was passed to and ejected from the coaxial waterbarrel surrounding the sulfur barrel, so that both the sulfur and waterstreams were emitted from their respective barrels at high velocity andmixed at the vena contracta of the two streams. The product had particlediameters of about one-quarter inch and less. Sample particle analysisfor zinc established that the nutrient metal concentration varies from 0up to 30 weight percent between particles showing that very poordistribution had been obtained.

EXAMPLE 2

This operation involved the preparation of several zincoxide-hydrocarbon semi-stable suspensions of varying zinc concentration.The hydrocarbon was a surfactant-free, nonphytotoxic 90 N paraffinicspray oil containing less than 15 weight percent aromatics and having amelting point of -15° C. and an initial boiling point of 315° C. Thezinc oxide was powdered reagent grade Baker and Adams zinc oxide, all ofwhich passed 100 U.S. Standard screen.

The 90 N oil was placed in a container agitated with a 3-blade stirrerand the zinc oxide was gradually added with continued agitation toproduce seven different compositions containing 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70and 75 weight percent zinc oxide. Even at the higher concentrationsthese compositions were fluid, relatively stable suspensions. Althoughconcentration gradients gradually developed upon standing, homogeneousredistribution of the zinc oxide was readily achieved with only mildagitation.

During this operation I noted that some of the suspensions became veryviscous even before all of the zinc oxide had been combined with theoil. Analysis of the systems established the presence of more than 0.5weight percent water. Heating the mixture to a temperature of 120° C.(which was sufficient to reduce the water content to less than 0.5weight percent H₂ O) rapidly converted the mixtures to fluid, stablesuspensions.

This study also established that stable, fluid comixtures can beobtained at very high nutrient loadings, e.g., 40 to 75 percent nutrientexpressed as the oxide, provided that sufficiently anhydrous conditionsare maintained. This observation is particularly applicable to batch,and especially continuous processes in which high nutrient-oil ratiosare desired. While this finding applies to all compositions discussedherein, it is particularly advantageous with the oxides of zinc, iron,magnesium and manganese.

EXAMPLE 3

This operation involved the preparation of homogeneous, sulfur-zincoxide-oil fusions using zinc oxide-hydrocarbon suspensions similar tothose described in Example 2. Two suspension concentrations containing20 and 50 weight percent of the reagent grade zinc oxide described inExample 2 in the 90 N oil were employed to obtain homogeneous fusionscontaining 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 15 and 25 weight percent zinc as themetal. The 20 weight percent zinc oxide in oil suspension was used toproduce the fusions containing 2 weight percent zinc and less. The 50weight percent zinc oxide suspensions were used for the higherconcentrations.

The zinc oxide-hydrocarbon suspensions were produced as described inExample 2. These suspensions were then added to a sulfur melt bygradually pouring the suspension into molten sulfur at 125° to 130° C.with continuous stirring. The resulting blend was then poured into thevortex of a highly agitated 5-gallon water bath. This procedure resultedin the formation of particles having diameters of 1/4-inch or less.Particle analysis by scanning electron microscope established that thezinc oxide was homogeneously distributed throughout the matrix of eachparticle and that it was evenly distributed throughout the entireparticle population.

The water phase was also analyzed for zinc and hydrocarbon. Neither thezinc nor hydrocarbon could be detected, showing that there was nonutrient loss to the quench medium.

Example 4

This operation involved the preparation of seven semistable suspensionsof ferric oxide in the 90 N spray oil described in Example 2. The ferricoxide was anhydrous, red pigment grade ferric oxide and was compoundedwith a 90 N oil in amounts corresponding to 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70 and75 weight percent of the oxide. Fluid, stable suspensions were obtainedin each instance with only mild agitation.

Example 5

Ferric oxide-hydrocarbon comixtures prepared as described in Example 4and containing 20 and 50 weight percent Fe₂ O₃ were used to producehomogeneous ferric oxide distributions in sulfur by the proceduredescribed in Example 3. These compositions had concentrations of 0.5, 1,2, 3, 5, 10, 15 and 25 weight percent iron expressed as the metal. Thefusions containing 1 weight percent and less of iron were prepared withcomixtures containing 20 weight percent Fe₂ O₃. The higherconcentrations were obtained with the 50 weight percent comixtures.

Uniform products having particle diameters of 1/4-inch or less wereobtained in each instance. Product homogeneity was confirmed byinspection of fractured particles.

Example 6

Semi-stable suspensions of a multinutrient source in the 90 N spray oilwere obtained as described in Example 2 having nutrient concentrationsof about 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70 and 75 weight percent total nutrientmetal expressed as the oxides. The multinutrient source was a powdered,commercially-available, fertilizer minor nutrient adjuvant containing 25weight percent iron, 27 weight percent zinc and 3 weight percentmanganese expressed as the metals and present as the oxides. Theadjuvant was a finely divided powder, all of which passed 100 U.S.Standard mesh. The mixtures were produced as described in Example 2using the 90 N spray oil there described. Semi-stable suspensionsresulted in each case with only mild agitation.

Example 7

A zinc oxide-sulfur-hydrocarbon fusion similar to those described inExample 3 was used to treat a Zinfandel grape vine with "little leaf"disease (zinc deficiency). Supplement particles were placed in a shallowtrench beside the vine. Within one week all new leaves on the vine werehealthy and of normal size and exhibited no evidence of "little leaf"disease which was still evident in the leaves produced prior toapplication.

Example 8

A zinc oxide-sulfur-hydrocarbon fusion containing 3 weight percent zincexpressed as the metal similar to those described in Example 3 was usedto treat the roots of an almond tree with symptoms of zinc chlorosisevidenced by misshapen leaves with chlorotic streaks. Several augerholes were drilled to the level of the tree roots. Supplement particleswere placed in the holes which were then refilled. Within 3 to 4 monthsthe tree showed no symptoms of zinc deficiency on either old or newfoliage.

The fusions used in Examples 7 and 8 were prepared from zinc oxide. Yetthe results obtained in each case contrast significantly with thoseexpected with zinc oxide alone, in which case little or no improvementwould occur within the same time span under comparable soil conditions.

I claim:
 1. The homogeneous solid fusion comprising a continuous rhombicsulfur matrix and a comixture of at least one particulate mineralnutrient and hydrocarbon dispersed throughout said continuous sulfurmatrix, wherein said fusion contains at least about 50 weight percentrhombic sulfur and between about 1 and about 50 weight percent of saidcomixture based on the total weight of said fusion, said comixturecomprises at least about 5 weight percent based on the total weight ofsaid comixture of at least one particulate plant nutrient compoundselected from the group consisting of compounds of phosphorus, zinc,iron, copper, magnesium, manganese, molybdenum, boron, and combinationsthereof, and at least two weight percent based on the weight of saidcomixture of a hydrocarbon non-reactive with said sulfur at said melttemperature and having a melting point below the melt temperaturehereinafter defined and a boiling point above said melt temperature, theamount of said hydrocarbon being at least sufficient to wet the surfacesof said particulate mineral nutrient, said fusion having been preparedby the method including the steps of (a) forming a melt comprising about1 to about 50 weight percent based on the total weight of said melt ofsaid nutrient-hydrocarbon comixture and at least about 50 weight percentsulfur at a melt temperature within the range of about 120° to about400° C., and (b) cooling said melt to a temperature below its meltingpoint to form said homogeneous, solid fusion.
 2. The homogeneous fusiondefined by claim 1 comprising at least about 70 weight percent rhombicsulfur, wherein said melt temperature is within the range of about 120°to about 250° C., said hydrocarbon-nutrient comixture contains at leastabout 10 weight percent of said nutrient compound and at least about 30weight percent of said hydrocarbon based on the weight of saidcomixture, and said hydrocarbon is selected from paraffinic, aromaticand alkyl aromatic hydrocarbons and combinations thereof.
 3. Thehomogeneous fusion defined by claim 1 wherein said melt is quenched bycontacting it with water under shearing conditions sufficient tocomminute and solidify said melt into particles of said homogeneousfusion having diameters of about one inch or less.
 4. The homogeneousfusion defined by claim 1 comprising at least 70 weight percent rhombicsulfur, about 1 to about 20 weight percent of said hydrocarbon-nutrientcomixture, wherein said comixture comprises about 10 to about 75 weightpercent of said nutrient mineral compound.
 5. The homogeneous fusiondefined in claim 4 wherein said nutrient mineral compound is selectedfrom the group consisting of the oxides of zinc, iron, copper,manganese, magnesium, molybdenum, boron and combinations thereof, andsaid hydrocarbon is selected from paraffinic, aromatic and alkylaromatic hydrocarbons and mixtures thereof.
 6. The homogeneous fusiondefined by claim 1 comprising about 1 to about 20 weight percent basedon the total weight of said fusion of said hydrocarbon-nutrientcomixture, said comixture contains at least about 10 weight percent ofsaid nutrient mineral compound and at least about 30 weight percent ofsaid hydrocarbon, said nutrient mineral compound is selected from ironoxide, zinc oxide, and combinations thereof, and saidhydrocarbon-nutrient mineral comixture is substantially anhydrous. 7.The soil treating method including the steps of adding to said soil thehomogeneous fusion defined by claim 1 in particle form.
 8. The soiltreating method including the steps of applying to said soil at leastabout 20 pounds per acre of the homogeneous fusion defined by claim 4 inparticle form.
 9. The soil treating method including the steps ofapplying to said soil at least about 20 pounds per acre of thehomogeneous fusion defined by claim
 5. 10. The soil treating methodincluding the steps of applying to said soil at least about 20 poundsper acre of the homogeneous fusion defined by claim 6.